Home » Featured » Man’s Remorse Kept Him Out of Jail on Child Porn Charges
Click Here To Hide Tor

Man’s Remorse Kept Him Out of Jail on Child Porn Charges

A Kempshott man’s remorse, cooperation with police, and confessions, helped him avoid a prison sentence for sharing child pornography on the darknet. The Winchester Crown Court, on Thursday 14, heard how 27-year-old Nicolas James Bone visited sites on the darknet to download almost 60 illegal pictures and videos.

For effectively two reasons, Bone’s case vividly contrasts a recent case of the same nature in Virginia. On September 14, a Chesapeake man admitted to downloading more than 100,000 pictures and videos depicting child abuse. That case, still ongoing, spawned from a major Homeland Security Investigations operation. While the court did not reveal how law enforcement caught Nicolas James Bone, they did make an explicit note, pointing out the small number of illegal files Bone had downloaded.

More than a single discrepancy existed between Bone’s case and the majority of cases from other darknet child pornography investigations. In most cases—or at least most of the ones we know of—the defendant watched and downloaded material that disturbed the seasoned judge, or prosecution. Bone used the darknet to find a teenager. A young teenager, but a teenager nonetheless.

Of the 52 images on the defendant’s computer, only 11 fell into Category A. Five in Category B. And 36 in Category C. The majority of the images depicted sexual abuse of older children. While illegal, some of the ages would start petty technicality arguments. The 27-year-old father had looked for pictures of 15-year-old girls, he explained to police officers after his arrest.

The court heard how Bone found himself repulsed by the images of younger children. Christopher Wing, prosecution, said “[Bone] realised he got no sexual gratification for images of children under a certain age, and when watching a video of a quite young child that had been shared [with him], he threw up on his bed.”

Bone’s alleged disinterest did not outweigh the fact the he had both actively shared child abuse content and downloaded it for himself. However, Robin Sellers, defending, argued that a classic sentence would have been unfitting as the defendant had already fixed himself, for lack of better terminology.

Judge Jane Miller QC agreed. Bone’s confession, Judge Miller said, combined with his cooperation and incredibly low number of illegal pictures (relatively speaking), warranted a lesser penalty than convicted child pornography offenders in many cases. Bone will serve a 10 month sentence, suspended for two years. He will also be listed on the sex offender registry for five years.

10 comments

  1. oh it’s that simple now.. in that case.. we are all so sorry and regret our actions, we apologies for selling any drugs to people that actually wanted to buy and use them.. we are sorry… we are sorry…

    lock away the dirty nonce…

  2. It’s about time courts started looking at cases with rationality rather than through the lens of hysteria and unkempt rage. This trend will only continue as the discrimination against minor-attracted persons ends, as it rightly should.

  3. If I see a high school girl, bend over and tie her shoe laces, my eyes are all over her bottom.

    Do I feel bad about it ? Not really?

    Men have been attracted to young girls since the dawn of time, nothing will change that. I am not saying it is right or wrong, but for me it is instinctive and that will never change.

    • dannu hall you are a paedophile – and i correct you “paedophiles have been attracted to young girls since the dawn of time, nothing will change that…” In contrast men are attracted to women. Keep your perverted eyes to yourself and your paedophillic comments to yourself you should be locked up. I say bring back the death penalty for paedophiles – but the law says lock you up because it is perverted and WRONG = you should feel bad about it – you are so wrong in your actions. Don’t reply to this I don’t and will not converse with paedophiles.

      • joethejipsy

        Nonce’s require jungle justice…

      • Men are attracted to women, not old dogs like that Macron chick, and women peak at 18. A perfectly normal man will get hard looking at a tight package, a deranged politically correct metrosexual will force himself to like “women” who are old and diseased with multiple STDs.

  4. So you people are implying that it’s unnatural and “disgusting” to men to be sexually attracted to young teenagers? Is this serious? Really? How much cucked you have to be to believe in that? There are already many papers that have looked into men’s sexual arousal patterns and all of them concluded that it’s indeed common for men to show preference for young teens.

    If you look at tinder or OkCupid data you can see that the peek age for hit is 18 year old for women, so most of guys in this apps, no matter their age, try to hit the youngest girls possible. If these apps allowed girls under 18 they would probably be very popular too.

    Again, it’s common to men to be attracted to young teenage girls, it has an evolutionary basis, it’s well established. It always amaze me that even here in a supposed free environment there is still many cucks sponsoring this type of feminist-pc mindset. All you’re doing is creating a worse social environment for yourselves and your relatives in the future. I rest my case.

    • REALITY CHECK

      Very well said, “modern” feminist theories say that you have to let an old “woman” boss you around and let her invite other men to fuck you to be “normal”, all this modern talk about what is “normal” has gone beyond any logical limit. Real normal men get hard with “barely legal” and not with your average middle aged tired whore.

      The only reason behind considering natural behavior “abnormal” is the jealously of militant feminists.

  5. Jooseppi Hilarion

    Society has gone absolutely mad indeed. On one hand, you have these overzealous feminists that dare suggest that the mere random chance of being born male will somehow ensure success in life whilst simultaneously demonizing men for actually being attracted to women, of any age but in particular younger women.

    And then, on the other hand, we have women who voluntarily shave their pubic hair, have their labia snipped and do whatever they can to have their faces appear younger as well. What image are you women trying to portray, that of a 10-year old? Because, honestly, most women, most people in fact will have started developing their pubic hair by 11, easy. And the whole labia snipping… not only is it bizarre and just plain sick, it also trying to appear… EXTREMELY young.

    So, yeah… go blame us men for all the wrong doings in the world. Oh, and let’s not forget that the practice of female circumcision actually typically is kept in practice and being upheld… by the women in those very communities it is being practiced in. Yes, that is a fact.

    Facepalm. Women.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Captcha: *